[x264-devel] Re: H.264 encoder
Guillaume POIRIER
poirierg at gmail.com
Wed Feb 1 21:07:32 CET 2006
Hi,
On 2/1/06, JGJones <jgjones at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not a dev myself too, so my voice carry nothing too. I remember I
> once asked about licencing because being deaf myself, videophone are of
> huge importance to me.
>
> And I was wondering what the problem was between the licences that
> OpenH323 use (for GnomeMeeting) and x264 so that I could have H264 video
> calls as the current H261 video in use by OpenH323 is of extremely poor
> quality and no good for sign language at all whatsoever.
>
> Does the change to LGPL means OpenH323 could then be able to work with
> it or make use of it?
As stated here: http://www.openh323.org/fom-serve/cache/7.html
OpenH232 is covered by the Mozilla Public License, which doesn't seem
incompatible with the GPL. So my guess is just that OpenH232 lacks ppl
to add x264 support.
Guillaume
--
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice.
Bill Cosby
MPlayer's doc isn't up-to-date. Visit my updated mirror here:
http://tuxrip.free.fr//MPlayer-DOCS-HTML/en/
http://tuxrip.free.fr//MPlayer-DOCS-HTML/fr/
--
This is the x264-devel mailing-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list