[x264-devel] Re: x264 roadmap

[Guillaume POIRIER]

Hi,

On 3/5/06, Andrea Barbieri <andrea.barbieri at movingimageresearch.com> wrote:
> LM:=Loren Merritt
>
> LM> On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Andrea Barbieri wrote:
> LM>
> LM> > is a roadmap of x264 new features available for general consumption (no
> LM> > great details nor exact timing, just an idea of what to expect next) or is
> LM> > it just bug-fixes/performance enhancements?
> LM>
> LM> I do not plan features in advance.
>
> interesting observation
>
> I hope that my question didn't influence the removal of the TODO file from
> the repository.
>
> the knowledge of what needs to be improved might also help developers
> mediated contributions from a larger pool of expertise... and to know what
> currently unsupported ISO/IEC 14496-10 features (mainly all of the FRExt
> ones, open GOP) would score high in the developers agenda might improve as
> well the chances of targetted efforts and contributions to be made.

Loren has a todo list online:
http://students.washington.edu/lorenm/src/x264/todo.txt

In addition to that, there are 2 other functionality that several
users have requested on this mailing list: grayscale encoding and
interlaced encoding. Those two will eventually be implemented "when
someone with enough knowledge and time will do it".

Guillaume

--
Reinventing the wheel certainly is annoying, but as long as all other
wheels are square...

Reimar Döffinger

-- 
This is the x264-devel mailing-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html