[x264-devel] Re: x264 roadmap

[Robert Swain]

On Sunday 05 March 2006 14:00, Guillaume POIRIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/5/06, Andrea Barbieri <andrea.barbieri at movingimageresearch.com> wrote:
> > LM:=Loren Merritt
> >
> > LM> On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Andrea Barbieri wrote:
> > LM>
> > LM> > is a roadmap of x264 new features available for general consumption
> > (no LM> > great details nor exact timing, just an idea of what to expect
> > next) or is LM> > it just bug-fixes/performance enhancements?
> > LM>
> > LM> I do not plan features in advance.
> >
> > interesting observation
> >
> > I hope that my question didn't influence the removal of the TODO file
> > from the repository.
> >
> > the knowledge of what needs to be improved might also help developers
> > mediated contributions from a larger pool of expertise... and to know
> > what currently unsupported ISO/IEC 14496-10 features (mainly all of the
> > FRExt ones, open GOP) would score high in the developers agenda might
> > improve as well the chances of targetted efforts and contributions to be
> > made.
>
> Loren has a todo list online:
> http://students.washington.edu/lorenm/src/x264/todo.txt
>
> In addition to that, there are 2 other functionality that several
> users have requested on this mailing list: grayscale encoding and
> interlaced encoding. Those two will eventually be implemented "when
> someone with enough knowledge and time will do it".

IIRC Alex Izvorski has/had almost finished interlaced encoding.

Rob

-- 
This is the x264-devel mailing-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html