[x264-devel] Re: x264 improvement
Eric Petit
titer at m0k.org
Sat Mar 11 16:23:25 CET 2006
Firas Al-Tahan wrote:
> Why did this stop? Is it because Apple went with Intel? Off the top of
> your head - was it optimized very well?
> From what I'm seeing, Core Duo Mac Mini's at 1.63GHz are getting double
> the frame rates of my Dual Processor G5 at 2.0GHz. As you can imagine -
> I'm not impressed! I can see there has been Altivec work done - but I'm
> not sure how much and how up to date it is.
> Where / who would I need to get in contact with to get the ball rolling
> again?
I just didn't have much time to keep working on it. x264 is clearly
not as optimized for PPC as it is for x86 (Altivec provides a ~100%
speed bump from the C version, whereas MMX/SSE provide a 300+% speed
bump). Some parts aren't optimized at all, and others could certainly be
optimized better (I'm no AltiVec guru, and especially, dealing with
AltiVec and unaligned data everywhere gave me a hard time).
If you or someone else can spend some time to it, I'll sure try to
answer any question you might have.
--
Eric Petit
--
This is the x264-devel mailing-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list