[x265] [PATCH] asm: sse4 10bit code for sign primitive

Deepthi Nandakumar deepthi at multicorewareinc.com
Thu Jun 25 12:04:13 CEST 2015


On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:19 PM, <rajesh at multicorewareinc.com> wrote:

> # HG changeset patch
> # User Rajesh Paulraj<rajesh at multicorewareinc.com>
> # Date 1435219198 -19800
> #      Thu Jun 25 13:29:58 2015 +0530
> # Node ID a03487d6295cf89b065eff36e5c1ec4ee4253243
> # Parent  b1af4c36f48a4500a4912373ebcda9a5540b5c15
> asm: sse4 10bit code for sign primitive
>
>      calSign  6.16x    356.91          2197.63
>
> diff -r b1af4c36f48a -r a03487d6295c source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp
> --- a/source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp      Wed Jun 24 10:36:15 2015
> -0500
> +++ b/source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp      Thu Jun 25 13:29:58 2015
> +0530
> @@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@
>          p.saoCuOrgE3[0] = PFX(saoCuOrgE3_sse4);
>          p.saoCuOrgE3[1] = PFX(saoCuOrgE3_sse4);
>          p.saoCuOrgB0 = PFX(saoCuOrgB0_sse4);
> +        p.sign = x265_calculateSign_sse4;
>
> This should be PFX().


>          LUMA_ADDAVG(sse4);
>          CHROMA_420_ADDAVG(sse4);
> diff -r b1af4c36f48a -r a03487d6295c source/common/x86/loopfilter.asm
> --- a/source/common/x86/loopfilter.asm  Wed Jun 24 10:36:15 2015 -0500
> +++ b/source/common/x86/loopfilter.asm  Thu Jun 25 13:29:58 2015 +0530
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>  cextern pw_2
>  cextern pw_1023
>  cextern pb_movemask
> +cextern pw_1
>
>
>
>  ;============================================================================================================
> @@ -1419,3 +1420,49 @@
>
>  .end:
>      RET
> +
>
> +;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +; void calSign(int8_t *dst, const pixel *src1, const pixel *src2, const
> int endX)
>
> +;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +%if HIGH_BIT_DEPTH
> +INIT_XMM sse4
> +cglobal calculateSign, 4, 7, 5
> +    mova            m0, [pw_1]
> +    mov             r4d, r3d
> +    shr             r3d, 4
> +    add             r3d, 1
> +    mov             r5, r0
> +    movu            m4, [r0 + r4]
> +.loop
> +    movu            m1, [r1]        ; m2 = pRec[x]
> +    movu            m2, [r2]        ; m3 = pTmpU[x]
> +
> +    pcmpgtw         m3, m1, m2
> +    pcmpgtw         m2, m1
> +    pand            m3, m0
> +    por             m3, m2
> +    packsswb        m3, m3
> +    movh            [r0], xm3
> +
> +    movu            m1, [r1 + 16]   ; m2 = pRec[x]
> +    movu            m2, [r2 + 16]   ; m3 = pTmpU[x]
> +
> +    pcmpgtw         m3, m1, m2
> +    pcmpgtw         m2, m1
> +    pand            m3, m0
> +    por             m3, m2
> +    packsswb        m3, m3
> +    movh            [r0 + 8], xm3
> +
> +    add             r0, 16
> +    add             r1, 32
> +    add             r2, 32
> +    dec             r3d
> +    jnz             .loop
> +
> +    mov             r6, r0
> +    sub             r6, r5
> +    sub             r4, r6
> +    movu            [r0 + r4], m4
> +    RET
> +%endif
> diff -r b1af4c36f48a -r a03487d6295c source/common/x86/loopfilter.h
> --- a/source/common/x86/loopfilter.h    Wed Jun 24 10:36:15 2015 -0500
> +++ b/source/common/x86/loopfilter.h    Thu Jun 25 13:29:58 2015 +0530
> @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@
>      void PFX(saoCuOrgB0_ ## cpu)(pixel* rec, const int8_t* offsetBo, int
> ctuWidth, int ctuHeight, intptr_t stride); \
>      void PFX(saoCuStatsE2_ ## cpu)(const pixel *fenc, const pixel *rec,
> intptr_t stride, int8_t *upBuff1, int8_t *upBufft, int endX, int endY,
> int32_t *stats, int32_t *count); \
>      void PFX(saoCuStatsE3_ ## cpu)(const pixel *fenc, const pixel *rec,
> intptr_t stride, int8_t *upBuff1, int endX, int endY, int32_t *stats,
> int32_t *count); \
> -    void PFX(calSign_ ## cpu)(int8_t *dst, const pixel *src1, const pixel
> *src2, const int endX);
> +    void PFX(calSign_ ## cpu)(int8_t *dst, const pixel *src1, const pixel
> *src2, const int endX); \
> +    void PFX(calculateSign_ ## cpu)(int8_t *dst, const pixel *src1, const
> pixel *src2, const int endX);
>
> Whats the difference between calculateSign_ and calSign_? They have the
same function signature and are assigned to the same primitive?


>  DECL_SAO(sse4);
>  DECL_SAO(avx2);
> _______________________________________________
> x265-devel mailing list
> x265-devel at videolan.org
> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x265-devel/attachments/20150625/72b29db1/attachment.html>


More information about the x265-devel mailing list