[x265] Wrong version info?

Roger Pack rogerdpack2 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 03:44:14 UTC 2022


On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 6:35 AM Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer <contact at ligh.de> wrote:
>
> It would be wrong, though, if Roger compiled for 64 bit but this binary
> reports "[32 bit][noasm]" when running. Is this the case?

Yes.  I believe the binary is actually 64 bit.  The noasm seems to be
what it does as well (not sure why), thanks!


More information about the x265-devel mailing list