[x265] Wrong version info?

Tue Mar 22 07:00:10 UTC 2022

Am 22.03.22 um 04:44 schrieb Roger Pack:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 6:35 AM Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer <contact at ligh.de> wrote:
>> It would be wrong, though, if Roger compiled for 64 bit but this binary
>> reports "[32 bit][noasm]" when running. Is this the case?
> Yes.  I believe the binary is actually 64 bit.  The noasm seems to be
> what it does as well (not sure why), thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> x265-devel mailing list
> x265-devel at videolan.org
> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
Is this on ARM64? Then see last comment here:
https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265_git/issues/604/linux-arm-aarch64-build-failing-for-high