[libbluray-devel] Found a JRE compiled for Android (ARM)

Vitor Dall'Acqua veggav at gmail.com
Sat Jan 23 20:25:50 UTC 2021


Well... managed to get it to see...

2021-01-23 18:21:35.375 T:19738   DEBUG <general>: CBlurayCallback::Logger
- bdj.c:311: Opening /storage/emulated/0/JAVA/jre/lib/aarch64/server/libjvm
...

2021-01-23 18:21:35.377 T:19738   DEBUG <general>: CBlurayCallback::Logger
- dl_posix.c:54: can't open library
'/storage/emulated/0/JAVA/jre/lib/aarch64/server/libjvm.so': dlopen failed:
library "/storage/emulated/0/JAVA/jre/lib/aarch64/server/libjvm.so" needed
or dlopened by
"/mnt/expand/cab01563-bcca-48fa-a0bf-0fbddaf9b192/app/org.xbmc.kodi19DV-BHAaVSj7u8lhvDk_OSQttQ==/lib/arm64/libkodi.so"
is not accessible for the namespace "classloader-namespace"





On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 3:30 PM Shaya Potter <spotter at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> i looked at what they call "source code", its not source (unless I'm
> missing it).  It's just the pre built binaries.
>
> I didn't say that google did that exactly, I said, I think they have made
> it difficult to put executables there in Android Q (with that said, might
> not be a near term proble if the app isn't targeted specifically to android
> Q's API level, which kodi probably is not).  What I also said, I dont know
> how that would impact dlopen (which is not directly executing the program)
> if android would block that as well.
>
> with that said, I'd still think (perhaps incorrectly) from a security
> point of view, kodi would want to ship the jvm within their apk as this
> would prevent external things from breaking it and not have it provided by
> the user (then again, on all desktop environments it is provided by the
> user).
>
> for reference where I came across a discussion a bit ago:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/androiddev/comments/b2inbu/psa_android_q_blocks_executing_binaries_in_your/
>
> if I had to guess, it probably would work for now (even on Q), but in the
> future there might be issues as google prevents older and older api targets
> from being updated in the play store.
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 8:08 PM Vitor Dall'Acqua <veggav at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> But Shaya, the source is present in the linked file here.
>>
>> The thing is that it's beyond my capabilities try to add this to Kodi as
>> a dependency.
>> Also another problem I'm seeing here is that while I'm able to pack into
>> an apk the libjvm.so so it is installed when you install Kodi, this isn't
>> the case for the .jar files.
>>
>> You mentioned that Google made sure to close down the possibility of
>> loading a .so file from outside the app folder?
>> So you think even if libbluray could read /storage/emulated/0/ it would
>> fail in use the libjvm?
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:30 PM Shaya Potter <spotter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> vitor, I'd think that kodi's path manipulation wouldn't impact the jre
>>> at all.  It's just for internal kodi use for themes and media and the like,
>>> but nothing to do with OS operations (and petri can verify if this or true,
>>> motivated the need for libbluray to have the ability to a pluggable set of
>>> file system operations that could be provided to it).  But while libbluray
>>> can use the a provided set of operations, the jvm can't.
>>>
>>> I'd think one of your goals should be to get the group that made those
>>> jvm binaries to release the source and build for it, then kodi can include
>>> it as part of their build process and even ship with it in the play store.
>>> I'd think vlc would be interested in this, as well?  This would also be
>>> necessary as would have to ship different jvm's for 32 bit kodi and 64 bit.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:22 PM Vitor Dall'Acqua <veggav at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Petri, do you happen to have the source with your latest changes?
>>>>
>>>> code.videolan.org is down and I would like to work on this during the
>>>> weekend.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:08 PM Petri Hintukainen <
>>>> phintuka at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> pe, 2021-01-22 kello 16:54 -0300, Vitor Dall'Acqua kirjoitti:
>>>>> > I have not tried to build Java from source.
>>>>> > The version used by Termux, can be found as pre compiled and source
>>>>> > here:
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://github.com/Hax4us/java/releases/download/v8/jdk8_aarch64.tar.gz
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I can give a go with Kodi, which is what I'm familiar with, to git
>>>>> > clone the latest changes from libbluray, add the lib/arm/client to it
>>>>> > and add the files from that archive linked here.
>>>>> > Does it still need a bin folder inside? is the structure correct
>>>>> > there?
>>>>>
>>>>> Structure seems to be normal. I think you need only files from
>>>>> /jdk8/jre/ and maybe from /glib/ (?).
>>>>>
>>>>> JAVA_HOME would point to .../jdk8/ or .../jdk8/jre/. Or, you could try
>>>>> if simply symlinking .../jdk8/jre/lib/aarch64/server/libjvm.so next to
>>>>> libbluray.so works.
>>>>>
>>>>> The files in top-level bin folder are wrapper scripts. Looking at
>>>>> those, you may need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH so that libraries from /glib
>>>>> can be found. But I don't know if JVM needs those, or if those are only
>>>>> used with some of the applications.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> libbluray-devel mailing list
>>>>> libbluray-devel at videolan.org
>>>>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/libbluray-devel
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> libbluray-devel mailing list
>>>> libbluray-devel at videolan.org
>>>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/libbluray-devel
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> libbluray-devel mailing list
>>> libbluray-devel at videolan.org
>>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/libbluray-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> libbluray-devel mailing list
>> libbluray-devel at videolan.org
>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/libbluray-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> libbluray-devel mailing list
> libbluray-devel at videolan.org
> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/libbluray-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/libbluray-devel/attachments/20210123/3e983b91/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the libbluray-devel mailing list